Mapping the KPU Open Education Landscape OEP at KPU Research Project Amanda Grey, MLIS Dr. Nishan Perera, PhD Photo by Kelsy Gagnebin on Unsplash Acknowledgement of Country Kwantlen Polytechnic University campuses are located on the unceded traditional and ancestral territory of the qʼʷa:n̓ƛʼən̓ (Kwantlen) xʷməθkʷəy̓əm (Musqueam) q̓ic̓əy̓ (Katzie) SEMYOME (Semiahmoo) Photo © KPU, ARR scəwaθən məsteuəxʷ (Tsawwassen) qiqeyt (Qayqayt) kʷikʷəƛ̓əm (Kwikwetlem) Introduction What is our study about? Photo by Kelsy Gagnebin on Unsplash Presentation Outline • Objectives • Methodology • Preliminary data results • Next steps Image by jessica45 from Pixabay Objectives What did we want to know? Image by -Ritaund mit from Pixabay We wanted to know… Image by -Rita- und mit from Pixabay • What barriers KPU faculty experience? • Are faculty willing to engage? • What topics do faculty want to learn more about? • How many of our faculty are already engaged in open pedagogy? Methodology How did we go about the study? Photo by Antoni Shkraba on Pexels Research Questions Photo by Antoni Shkraba on Pexels • How are faculty engaging with Open Educational Practices? • with OER? • with Open Pedagogy? • How are faculty engaging with our supports and services? Survey and Focus Group Photo by Antoni Shkraba on Pexels Phase 1 - Survey Phase 2 - Focus Group Research Framework – AIDA Model Photo by Antoni Shkraba on Pexels Attention – What is it? Interest – I like it. Desire – I want it. Action – I’m getting it. Research Framework Adapted AIDA Model Photo by Antoni Shkraba on Pexels Attention What do faculty know about OEP at KPU? Interest Are faculty interested in engaging in OEP? Engagement How do faculty experience OEP? Supports How do faculty experience our support? Instrument Development Photo by Antoni Shkraba on Pexels • Survey • Likert scales • Quantitative • Limited open-ended questions • Accessible Language • Definitions of OER and Open Pedagogy Instrument Development Structure 1. Engagement with Open Educational Resources Definition and Examples of OERs 1.1 OER Availability, Use, and Barriers 1.2 OER-Related Practices 1.3 OER Initiatives at KPU 2. Engagement with Open Pedagogy Definition and Examples of Open Pedagogy 2.1 Incorporating Open Pedagogy and Barriers 2.2 Open Pedagogy-Related Practices 2.3 Open Pedagogy Initiatives at KPU Photo by Antoni Shkraba on Pexels Instrument Development Identified Barriers 1.2 OER Barriers • • • • • • • Searching for OERs Resistance from colleagues Concerns about quality Lack of available resources Technology Copyright and open licensing Sustainability Photo by Antoni Shkraba on Pexels 2.2 Open Pedagogy Barriers • • • • • • Risk asking students to publish Preparation time Limited classroom time Technological expertise/comfort Resistance from colleagues Challenge to conceptions of quality teaching Instrument Development Identified Practices 1.2 OER Practices • • • • • • Copyright & Open Licensing Attribution Web accessibility Sharing an promotion Technology and platforms Searching for OER Photo by Antoni Shkraba on Pexels 2.2 Open Pedagogy Practices • • • • • Students as creators Care and compassion / JEDI Renewable assignments Scaffolding tools & assignments Learner agency and consent Participant Recruitment Photo by Antoni Shkraba on Pexels Potential participant population = 1,200 Targeting a 10% response rate of 120 • • • • Direct email to faculty Department chairs KPU staff and faculty daily bulletin KPU Open listserv Preliminary Results What have we learned so far? Image by Roy Buri from Pixabay Preliminary Data OER Background Importance of commonly accepted benefits of using OER Summary: #1 Cost savings #2 Access to resources #3 Customization N=39 Preliminary Data Open Pedagogy Background Importance of commonly accepted benefits of Open Pedagogy Summary: #1 Student agency #2 Equitable creation of knowledge #3 Community involvement N=39 Preliminary Data OER Awareness, Use, Barriers Interest in replacing a commercial resource with an OER 26% 7% 67% 0% N=39 Preliminary Data Open Pedagogy Awareness, Use, Barriers Interest in incorporating open pedagogy 36% 26% 33% 5% N=39 Preliminary Data OER Practices Received Training on OER Practices Interested in Learning about OER Practices Preliminary Data Open Pedagogy Practices Received Training on Open Pedagogy Practices Interested in Learning about Open Pedagogy Practices Preliminary Data OER Initiatives at KPU Encouragement to use OERs Summary: Most encouragement from Institution Most discouragement from Colleagues and Discipline N=39 Preliminary Data Open Pedagogy Initiatives at KPU Encouragement to engage in Open Pedagogy Summary: Most encouragement from Institution Most discouragement from Discipline N=39 Focus Group Follow-up • Low awareness of supports and services How do we communicate better? • Topics to learn more about What workshops should we be offering? What is the balance of foundational info and extending practice? • Overcoming barriers Where are the specific issues (structural, philosophical, etc.) occuring? Conclusion Next Steps Photo by Tim Gouw on Unsplash Thank you! Amanda Grey Dr. Nishan Perera, PhD Open Education Strategist Director, Learning Technologies & Educational Development amanda.grey@kpu.ca nishan.perera@kpu.ca