Received: 12 January 2024 | Revised: 18 March 2024 | Accepted: 19 March 2024 DOI: 10.1002/pei3.10142 RESEARCH ARTICLE Abundance and diversity of fungal endophytes isolated from monk fruit (Siraitia grosvenorii) grown in a Canadian research greenhouse Li Ma1 | Janice F. Elmhirst2 | Rojin Darvish1 | Lisa A. Wegener1 | Deborah Henderson1 1 Institute for Sustainable Horticulture, Kwantlen Polytechnic University, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada 2 Elmhirst Diagnostics and Research, Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada Correspondence Li Ma, Institute for Sustainable Horticulture, Kwantlen Polytechnic University, 12666 72nd Avenue, Surrey, BC V3W 2M8, Canada. Email: li.ma6@kpu.ca Janice F. Elmhirst, Elmhirst Diagnostics and Research, 5727 Riverside Street, Abbotsford, BC V4X 1T6, Canada. Email: janice.elmhirst@shaw.ca Funding information NutraEx Food Inc Abstract Monk fruit (Siraitia grosvenorii) is an herbaceous perennial vine of the Cucurbitaceae family cultivated commercially mainly in southern China. There is very little information available about the fungal endophytes in monk fruit. In this study, monk fruit plants were grown from seeds in a research greenhouse at Kwantlen Polytechnic University in British Columbia, Canada to explore the abundance and diversity of their fungal endophytes. Fungal endophytes were isolated from seeds, seedlings, mature monk fruit plants, and fruits, and cultured on potato dextrose agar and water agar media. Isolates were identified by microscopic examination and BLAST comparison of ITS sequences to published sequences in GenBank. At least 150 species of fungal endophytes representing 60 genera and 20 orders were recovered from monk fruit tissues. Non-­metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) was carried out to explore the similarity of fungal communities among roots, stems, leaves, flowers, fruits, and seeds based on fungal orders. Our study showed that monk fruit plants are a rich source of fungal endophytes with the greatest abundance and diversity in leaves. This work has deepened our understanding of the intricate interactions between plants and fungi that sustain ecosystems and underpin plant health and resilience. KEYWORDS abundance, diversity, fungal communities, fungal endophytes, monk fruit, Siraitia grosvenorii 1 | I NTRO D U C TI O N of 1500–2002 mm, and average sunshine of 1237.3 ~ 1626.4 h (Zeng et al., 2011). Monk fruit [Siraitia grosvenorii (Swingle) C. Jeffrey ex A.M. Lu & Zhi Y. The fruit of the monk fruit vine has been used as natural, calorie-­ Zhang] is an herbaceous perennial vine of the Cucurbitaceae family free sweeteners (Xia et al., 2008) as well as folk medicine in China cultivated commercially mainly in the southern parts of China though for thousands of years due to their pharmaceutical properties such it is grown also in northern Thailand and has been exported to the as anti-­inflammation (Di et al., 2011), anti-­carcinogenesis (Takasaki USA and India (Shivani et al., 2021). It is commonly grown in Yongfu, et al., 2003), anti-­ oxidation, and anti-­ obesity (Sun et al., 2012). Longsheng, and Lingui counties in northern Guangxi Province with Mogrosides are the main compounds in the fruit responsible for the an annual average temperature of 16–20°C, average precipitation medicinal activities and sweetness. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. © 2024 The Authors. Plant-Environment Interactions published by New Phytologist Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Plant-Environment Interactions. 2024;5:e10142. https://doi.org/10.1002/pei3.10142  wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/pei3 | 1 of 16 2 of 16 | MA et al. Endophytic fungi live symbiotically within the internal tissues of healthy, living plants. Many are also saprophytic and some species may become pathogenic causing external infections upon plant senescence (Saikkonen et al., 1998; Stone et al., 2000). Most plants in natural ecosystems are hosts to one or more fungal endophytes, which may reside within roots, stems, leaves, and/or other plant parts (Petrini, 1986; Stone et al., 2004). The symbiotic relationship between fungal endophytes and their hosts ranges from parasitism where the endophytes benefit for growth and reproduction at the expense of the host, to mutualism where endophytes confer positive fitness benefits to their hosts while obtaining nutrients for their growth and reproduction (Aly et al., 2011; Rodriguez et al., 2009; Rodriguez & Redman, 2008). Many fungal endophytes have been shown to reduce infection by pathogens or disease development in their hosts (Busby et al., 2016). The transmission of endophytic fungi is primarily horizontal via airborne spores; some however can transmit vertically to new host generations via seed F I G U R E 1 Fresh monk fruit seeds collected from fruits. infections (Aly et al., 2011; Saikkonen et al., 2002). Besides their significant impacts on the survival and fitness of plants by conferring stress China. Fungal endophytes were isolated from seeds following the tolerance, increasing water use efficiency and plant biomass, or de- method used by Shearin et al. (2018) with modifications. Seeds were creasing fitness by altering resource allocation (Rodriguez et al., 2009), surface sterilized with 10% bleach for 2 min, rinsed with sterile reverse endophytic fungi also have great potential as a unique source of bi- osmosis water three times, and then placed on two types of microbial ologically active compounds with promising applications in medicine, growth media in petri dishes: potato dextrose agar (PDA) incorporated pharmacy, and agriculture (Aly et al., 2010; Nisa et al., 2015; Zhang with 0.005% streptomycin, and water agar (WA) media. The rinse et al., 2006). water was plated as a control to ensure that the surface sterilization It has been shown that both fungal and bacterial endophytes process was thorough. If fungal colonies were observed in the control can modify their genes by absorbing part of the host DNA into plates, the plates were discarded and new seed samples were surface-­ their genome for adaptation to the specific microenvironment (Aly sterilized and plated again. Plates were kept in an incubator at 27°C et al., 2011; Germaine et al., 2004), which may help explain the ability and monitored regularly. All fungal endophytes were recovered from of some endophytes to produce the same phytochemicals as those the media and each endophyte was sub-­cultured up to three times produced by their host plants (Stierle et al., 1993). Chen et al. (2020) until a pure culture was obtained for identification. isolated 15 endophytic fungal strains from roots, stems, leaves, and fruits of S. grosvenorii and found that two of them, Diaporthe angelicae Berk. Wehm. [syn. Mazzantia angelicae (Berk.) Lar. N. Vassiljeva] 2.2 | Growing plants and Fusarium solani (Mart.) Sacc., could produce some of the phytochemicals produced by the host plant. The other endophytic strains Plants were grown from seeds extracted from the fresh fruit from isolated from monk fruit were not named in the published report China. After removing the seed coat, seeds were surface sterilized (Chen et al., 2020). There is very little information available about with 10% bleach and placed on Murashige and Skoog medium in the fungal endophytes in monk fruit. The present study aimed to petri dishes to germinate. Seedlings were transplanted into Sunshine explore the abundance and diversity of fungal endophytes in monk Mix #2 potting media in 10 cm (4-­inch) pots and kept in a growth fruit grown in a Canadian research greenhouse environment, where chamber at 21°C and a 16 h light period for 10–12 weeks. After we can manipulate the environment to mimic the natural cultivat- five seedlings were taken for endophyte isolation at 9–10 weeks, ing conditions of monk fruit and minimize their interactions with the the remaining seedlings were transplanted into Sunshine Mix #4 in outdoor environment and potential contaminants. This also avoided 15 cm (one-­gallon) pots, one plant per pot, and placed in the research the introduction of novel fungal species into the environment. greenhouse located on the KPU Langley campus in January 2021. Plants were grown in the research greenhouse with RH around 75%, 2 | M ATE R I A L S A N D M E TH O DS 2.1 | Isolating endophytic fungi from seeds temperature at 18–32C in soilless media with drip irrigation. All plants were fertigated daily with a solution containing macro-­(N, 162; P, 30; K, 222; Ca, 136; Mg, 62; S, 100 ppm) and micronutrients (Fe, 1.0; Mn, 0.45; B, 0.1; Zn, 0.33; Cu, 0.035; Mo, 0.01; and NH4, 8.2 ppm), via an individual emitter in each pot. Flowering began in In 2020, dry monk fruit seeds obtained via Alibaba from Guangxi late June to early July 2021 and pollination was conducted by hand Naturix Import & Export Co., Ltd. (Nanning, Guangxi, China) and seeds using a fine paintbrush early in the morning when flowers were extracted from commercial fresh fruits (Figure 1) purchased from open. Fruits were harvested in October and November (Figure 2). | 3 of 16 MA et al. F I G U R E 2 Monk fruit plants grown in the research greenhouse at Kwantlen Polytechnic University, Langley, British Columbia, Canada. TA B L E 1 Number of samples collected from 17 fruiting monk fruit plants grown in the research greenhouse at the Institute for Sustainable Horticulture, KPU in 2021. Leaves Flowers Fruit Stems Roots Total samples 71 60 15 35 72 253 2.3 | Isolating endophytic fungi from the fresh tissues of monk fruit seedlings and mature plants sequencing. DNA was extracted using a protocol described by Cenis (1992) and subsequently amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using general internal transcribed spacer (ITS) primers, Samples of roots, stems, and leaves from five seedlings ITS1 and ITS 4 (White et al., 1990). The PCR products were sent (9–10 weeks old) in the growth chamber were taken for endophyte for sequencing to Psomagen Inc., Rockville, MD, USA. The internal isolation following the methods described by Musa et al. (2023). transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences of the endophytic fungi were Small pieces (about 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm in size) of plant tissue were compared to sequences deposited in GenBank using the National surface sterilized and rinsed with sterile reverse osmosis (RO) Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nucleotide basic local water using the method described above for isolation of seed en- alignment search tool (BLASTn) (http://​w ww.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​ dophytes. Fungal hyphae emerging from the tissue were selected BLAST​). Isolates were identified to genus and species based on the and transferred repeatedly to PDA+ 50 ppm streptomycin to ob- highest % identity in BLASTn, and morphological characteristics tain a pure culture. Endophytes were isolated from leaves (young obtained by microscopy. Where more than one identification was and old), stems (young and old), roots (from bulb and roots in soil), possible in GenBank, the genus or species was confirmed by micro- flowers (buds and fully-­o pen flowers), and fruit (pulp, seeds, and scopic comparison of fungal morphology to published descriptions. skin separated) at different maturity stages from 17 mature monk In a few cases where similar genera or species that could not be reli- fruit plants grown in the greenhouse (Table 1). The isolation and ably resolved by BLAST analysis or microscopic examination, both purification procedures were the same as for seeds and seedlings names are shown. Subsequently, each fungal taxon was classified described above. using the NCBI taxonomy browser database, US National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD (https://​w ww.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​t axon​omy/​ 2.4 | Identifying endophytic fungi brows​er/​w wwtax.​cgi). Fifty-­seven isolates from the mature plants that were less common, or had potential agronomic or other useful applications, have been stored in the Canadian Collection of Fungal After pure cultures of endophytes were obtained, they were iden- Cultures (DAOMC) in Ottawa, ON, Canada, under specimen num- tified morphologically by microscopy and genetically by DNA bers 252740–252796. 4 of 16 | MA et al. 2.5 | Analysis of endophytic fungal communities obtained, 13 from leaves and 14 from roots. Of the 11 isolates of Non-­ metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) was carried out to cucumerinum; all were from roots except one from a stem. Genera explore the similarity of fungal communities among roots, stems, isolated frequently only from roots included Fusarium (13 isolates, leaves, flowers, fruits, and seeds based on fungal orders (Peters including 10 F. oxysporum and one F. haematococcum/F. solani), Plectosphaerella obtained, nine were Pl. oligotrophica and two Pl. et al., 2020). NMDS was performed using Python (3.9.16) (Van Paraphaeosphaeria sporulosa (five), Sarocladium kiliense/S. strictum Rossum & Drake, 1995) with MDS implemented in the scikit-­learn (11), Simplicillium spp. (five), and Trichoderma spp. (five). Only three (sklearn) library. fungal endophytes were obtained in 35 samples from mature plant stems: one isolate each of Chaetomium globosum, Plectosphaerella 3 | R E S U LT S 3.1 | Overall fungal community composition oligotrophica, and Phialemonium inflatum. In addition to Coprinellus micaceus, species isolated from both reproductive and vegetative tissues were Acremonium spp., Amorphotheca resinae, Arthrinium spp. and Apiospora kogelbergensis, Aspergillus fumigatus and Asp. ochraceus, Beauveria bassiana (three from leaves and four from At least 150 species of fungal endophytes representing approxi- fruit skin), Chaetomium globosum, Cladosporium spp., Epicoccum ni- mately 60 genera and 20 orders were recovered in culture from the grum (one from fruit skin), Penicillium citrinum/P. steckii and other monk fruit tissues. Twenty-­seven isolates of endophytic fungi were Penicillium and Talaromyces spp. Many other endophytic fungi obtained from Chinese monk fruit seeds, either dry (purchased were isolated only once from mature monk fruit plant tissues. Four through Alibaba) or extracted from fresh fruit from China (Table 2). isolates produced no match to ITS sequences in GenBank at the Another 22 isolates were obtained from seedlings grown from the genus or species level and could be identified only as members of fresh seeds (Table 3). The most common genus isolated from seeds the Lasiosphaeriaceae or Pleosporales. and seedlings combined was Trichoderma (22 isolates: 7 or 8 species), followed by Diaporthe (4 isolates: 4 spp.) and Aspergillus (5 isolates: 3 spp.) from seeds, and Penicillium spp. (9 isolates: 4 spp. 3.2 | Fungal community by plant part from seedlings; 2 from seeds). In contrast, only four isolates were obtained from seeds extracted from fresh fruit harvested in the Fungal community composition differed among roots, stems, greenhouse: one each of Aspergillus fumigatus, Penicillium aethiopi- leaves, flowers, fruits, and seeds (Figures 3 and 4). The combined cum, an unidentified Penicillium sp., and Pseudogymnoascus panno- isolates represented 20 taxonomic orders. The dominant orders rum (Table 4). across all plant parts were Eurotiales (24%), Hypocreales (19%), Three hundred and twenty-­five isolates of fungal endophyte and Pleosporales (10%) (Figure 3). Leaves (12 orders) had the were obtained in culture from the 17 mature plants grown in the greatest diversity and abundance of fungal endophytes, followed greenhouse: 99 from reproductive tissues (flowers, fruit, and by roots (nine orders), fruits (nine orders), flowers (eight orders), seeds) (Table 4) and 226 from vegetative tissues (leaves, stems, seeds (seven orders), and stems (six orders) (Figure 3). The and roots) (Table 5). Not all of these isolates could be identified to dominant orders were Eurotiales (25 isolates), Agaricales (24 species. Due to the large number of isolates of some genera, such isolates), Pleosporales (23 isolates), and Xylariales (21 isolates) as Penicillium, not all were submitted for ITS sequencing but were in leaves and Hypocreales (40 isolates), Eurotiales (16 isolates), identified to genus by microscopic examination. The most com- and Glomerellales (10 isolates) in roots. The dominant orders in mon genera isolated from reproductive tissues were Arthrinium/ flowers, fruits, and seeds were Eurotiales (40 isolates), Xylariales Apiospora spp. (22 isolates; isolated equally from flowers and (22 isolates), Sordariales (17 isolates), and Hypocreales (15 fruit), Aspergillus spp. (17 isolates), Chaetomium spp. (18 isolates), isolates), followed by Agaricales (eight isolates). The NMDS Penicillium/Talaromyces spp. (14 isolates), and Coprinellus micaceus (stress = 0.0227) analysis showed the similarity/dissimilarity (six isolates). Coprinellus micaceus was isolated frequently from in fungal community composition among different plant parts leaf tissue also (six isolates), plus five isolates of Coprinellus floc- (Figure 4). The root and leaf fungal communities showed a strong culosus and two species of the closely related genus Coprinopsis: distinction from each other and those of the reproductive plant Coprinopsis alnivora (two isolates) and Coprinopsis cinerea (12 parts (flowers, fruits, and seeds), which were more similar in their isolates). Other genera frequently isolated from leaves were endophyte composition. The six orders of fungal endophytes Alternaria spp. (11 isolates, including three from roots), Aspergillus isolated from stems were more similar to the communities found in spp. (13, including one Asp. ochraceus from roots), Botrytis cine- the reproductive tissues (flowers, fruits, and seeds) than to those rea (six), Chaetomium spp. [eight, including one isolate from a in the leaves or roots. Some of the endophytic isolates could have stem and two Ch. aureum (teleomorph: Arcopilus aureus) from originated horizontally, that is, from the greenhouse environment, roots], Cladosporium spp. (12), Epicoccum nigrum (seven, includ- rather than vertically from within the monk fruit plants themselves ing one from a root), and Hypoxylon (18: 8 H. macrocarpum and since the greenhouse was not completely isolated from the 10 H. rubiginosum). Twenty-­s even isolates of Penicillium spp. were outdoor environment and the soilless media was not sterile. MN634490.1 (2); MN634664.1 3 Trichoderma viride Fresh seeds extracted from fresh fruits from China. Dry seeds purchased via Alibaba. b a Note: The closest match in BLASTn to sequences deposited in GenBank and percent identity are shown. MN634667.1 (4); MT341775.1 (2); MT023026.1 7 Trichoderma atroviride OQ608602.1; MT529218.1 2 Penicillium sumatraense Hypocreales KX426968.1 1 Penicillium brevicompactum Eurotiales MT337556.1/MK640580.1 MW341297.1 1 Diaporthe unshiuensis 1 MT199841.1 1 Diaporthe subclavata Exserohilum mcginnisii/E. rostratum MN650843.1 1 Diaporthe phaseolorum Pleosporales MW202983.1 MZ475126.1 1 1 Diaporthe hongkongensis Colletotrichum qilinense Diaporthales KY705054.1; LC379210.1 MN634011.1 2 Colletotrichum brevisporum 1 Botryosphaeria dothidea MT582757.1 1 Aspergillus tennesseensis Glomerellales KX258805.1 1 Aspergillus pseudoglaucus Botryosphaeriales MK841469.1; MF773659.1 3 Aspergillus hiratsukae GenBank accession # Eurotiales # of isolates Name Order 100 100 97.53; 98.51 99.81 98.8; 98.8 100 100 100 99.25 98.81 100; 100 100 100 99.61 98.39; 99.82; 99.38 % identity TA B L E 2 Identity of fungal endophytes recovered from dry monk fruit seeds and seeds from fresh fruit from China based on rDNA ITS sequence analyses and morphology. Alibaba, Fruit Alibaba Alibaba Alibaba Fruit Fruit Fruit Fruit Fruit Fruit Fruit Fruit Alibaba Alibaba Alibabaa, Fruitb Seed source MA et al. | 5 of 16 6 of 16 | MA et al. TA B L E 3 Identity of fungal endophytes recovered from leaves, stems, and roots of monk fruit seedlings grown from seed from China based on rDNA ITS sequence analyses and morphology. Order Name # of isolates GenBank accession # % identity Source Hypocreales Beauveria bassiana 1 MT441874.1 99.8 Stem Eurotiales Chromocleista sp. 1 MN644766.1 99.83 Stem Mortierellales Mortierella sp. 1 HE605241.1 100 Stem Eurotiales Paecilomyces tabacinus 1 LT548280.1 100 Root Eurotiales Penicillium citrinum 2 MN634531.1; MT597829.1 100; 100 Stem Hypocreales Penicillium meleagrinum 1 MF135516.1 99.82 Stem Penicillium steckii 1 OP615071.2 99.82 Stem Talaromyces islandicus 2 FR670311.1 89.96; 89.93 Root Trichoderma afroharzianum 4 MN644793.1 100; 99.83 (2); 99.66 Root; Stem Trichoderma asperellum 2 KY659051.1; LN846687.1 100; 99.82 Root Trichoderma atroviridae 2 MT604177.1; MT626716.1 100; 99.43 Stem Trichoderma harzianum 2 MT626717.1; MF078650.1 100; 99.65 Root; Leaf Trichoderma harzianum/T. lixii 1 MH339867.1/EF596951.1 100/100 Stem Trichoderma sp. 1 MK870660.1 100 Stem Note: The closest match in BLASTn to sequences deposited in GenBank and percent identity are shown. 4 | DISCUSSION resinae), which was isolated from both leaves and flower buds, damages jet fuel, diesel, petroleum and creosote-­treated wood, but may Monk fruit plants proved to be a rich source of fungal endophytes have useful environmental applications in remediation of hydrocar- with a great diversity and abundance, especially in leaves. The role bon contaminated sites (Rafin & Veignie, 2018). Chaetomium spp. are of these fungi in the monk fruit plants is likely to be as complex as the source of more than 100 useful secondary metabolites (Dwibedi their diversity. Some may be neutral commensalists, while others, et al., 2023). For example, Arcopilus aureus (anamorph: Chaetomium such as the wood-­ decaying Xylariaeceae (Hypoxylon, Nemania), aureum) produces high levels of resveratrol, a potent antioxidant, Meruliaceae (Phlebia tremellosa), Psathyrellaceae (Coprinellus and and sclerotiorin, which has anti-­ cancer properties (Dwibedi & Coprinopsis spp.), and Polyporaceae (Trametes hirsuta), may play Saxena, 2018). A. aureus has high lead tolerance and clearance, sug- a beneficial role in vegetative decay and nutrient cycling in the gesting a potential role in bioremediation of contaminated soils (Da natural environment, or protection against pathogens or herbivores. Sila et al., 2018). Members of the Xylariales, in particular, produce a wide array of Several of the endophytic species obtained in this study have secondary metabolites many of which are antagonists of other potential agricultural applications in enhancing plant growth and fungi and bacteria (Becker & Stadler, 2021). A few of the species tolerance to drought and other environmental stresses, or as bio- isolated may be hyperparasites of other fungal endophytes found logical control agents of disease and insect pests. The abundance in the monk fruit tissues, for example, Penicillium [Eupenicillium] and diversity of the fungal endophytes recovered from the monk cinnamopurpureum which grows on the heads of Aspergillus spp. fruit plants suggest multiple, layered means of protection against (Horn & Peterson, 2008). potential pests and adaptation to environmental stresses. Many In addition to the Xylariales, many of the other fungal species endophytic species with anti-­f ungal or plant growth-­p romoting obtained from the monk fruit plants are known to produce bioac- activity recovered in this study have also been isolated from tive compounds with medical or industrial applications. For example, grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.) (Kulišová et al., 2021), including Talaromyces purpureogenus (Keekan et al., 2020) and Penicillium brev- species of Aspergillus, Alternaria, Chaetomium, Epicoccum, and icompactum (Fonseca et al., 2022) produce pigments with commer- Penicillium. These and several other species isolated from leaves cial applications in the food processing industry. Several species are and fruit skin, are also common epiphytes that play a role in crop known to produce antibiotics, such as diketopiperazine, produced protection both on and below the leaf surface, and are often by Paraphaeosphaeria sporulosa, which is effective against salmo- transmitted horizontally. In grape, the most effective antifungal nella bacteria (Carrieri et al., 2020). Panaeolus subbalteatus is one of endophytes against Botrytis cinerea, the cause of bunch rot, were the most common sources of psilocybin, used in medical treatment. Alternaria and Epicoccum species which, along with Aspergillus The kerosene fungus, Amorphotheca resinae (anamorph: Hormoconis fumigatus, produce high levels of siderophores and antioxidants Morphology only MK518438.1 1 1 Alternaria sp. Alternaria alternata GU266274.1/OP237040.1 1 Arthrinium phaeospermum/Apiospora rasikravandrae Morphology only 9 Chaetomium spp. Cladosporium spp. Coprinellus micaceus Crustomyces sp./C. subabruptus Epicoccum nigrum Fusarium graminearum Agaricales Agaricales Pleosporales Hypocreales 1 1 1 6 4 KJ017740.1 FM200455.1 MN905889.1/MK454922.1 LR961895.1; MF156262.1; MH855975.1; LR961895.1 Morphology only MZ724883.1 3 Chaetomium novozelandicum Cladosporiales MT520580.1 KY132166.1; KP067224.1 1 5 Chaetomium cochliodes Chaetomium globosum OP794013.1 MT111139.1 Sordariales 1 4 Botrytis cinerea MH861876.1 MH345899.1 1 2 Aspergillus septulus Aspergillus tamarii Beauveria bassiana MN533721.1; MT447480.1; MN533721.1 8 Aspergillus ochraceus Helotiales Morphology to leaf isolates MT529448.1; MT529125.1; MH793851.1 6 Aspergillus fumigatus Hypocreales Eurotiales KX378907.1; KX378907.1 OW982982.1 20 Arthrinium spp. 1 Apiospora kogelbergensis Xylariales MN242723.1 Xylariales 1 Amorphotheca resinae Heliotiales OQ207544.1/KU523862.1 Pleosporales 1 Acremonium sclerotigenum/Scopulariopsis gossypii GenBank accession # Hypocreales # of isolates Name Order 99.59 99.4 99.67/99.50 99.69; 99.08; 99.7; 98.06 — 96.7 98.43; 99.81 99.03 — 99.8 99.62 99.12 99.82 99.62; 99.81; 99.63 — 99.65/99.47 99.63; 96.71 99.25 97.86 99.43 — 99.81/99.81 % identity Flower Fruit skin Fruit skin Flower (3); Flower bud (3) Flower bud (3); Fruit pulp (1) Fruit skin Flower (1); Fruit skin (4) Fruit skin Flower (1); Fruit skin (8) Fruit skin Fruit skin Fruit skin Fruit skin Flower (1); Flower bud (1) Fruit pulp (1); Fruit skin (5) Fruit pulp (4); Fruit skin (1); Seed (1) Fruit skin Flower (7); Fruit pulp (3); Fruit skin (10) Fruit skin Flower bud Flower Fruit skin Fruit pulp Source (Continues) 252744 252789 252743 252796 252758 252772 252751 DAOMC ID # TA B L E 4 Identity of fungal endophytes recovered from flowers, flower buds, fruits, and seeds of mature monk fruit plants grown in the KPU research greenhouse based on rDNA ITS sequence analyses and morphology. MA et al. | 7 of 16 Morphology only ON428665.1 MG554368.1/KX610136.1 MT797199.1/MT441635.1 5 1 1 1 Paecilomyces variotii Penicillium spp. Penicillium aethiopicum Penicillium citrinum /P. steckii Penicillium glabrum /P. corylophilum Eurotiales 99.66 99.81 99.29/97.7 100 99.61 99.7 99.44/99.44 99.82/99.64 98.89 — 99.47 99.75 % identity Flower Fruit skin Fruit skin Flower Seed Flower bud Flower bud Fruit skin Seed Flower (1); Fruit pulp (1); Fruit skin (2); Seed (1) Fruit skin Fruit skin Source 252776 252747 252762 252741 252748 252742 DAOMC ID # a All five isolates were the same Talaromyces species; no specific ID in GenBank. Note: The closest match in BLASTn to sequences deposited in GenBank and percent identity are shown, and the specimen ID # of isolates deposited in the Canadian Collection of Fungal Cultures (DAOMC). MF161297.1 MT635321.1 1 1 Talaromyces pupureogenus Trametes hirsuta MK450749.1 5a Talaromyces sp. Polyporales MH063252.1 1 Rhinocladiella similis Eurotiales KF156305.1 Chaetothyriales OL436998.1 1 Pseudogymnoascus pannorum 1 Phlebia tremellosa Incertae sedis OW988300.1 Polyporales 1 MG554248.1 Eurotiales 1 Hyphopichia burtonii GenBank accession # Saccharomycetales # of isolates Name Order TA B L E 4 (Continued) 8 of 16 | MA et al. Aureobasidium pullulans Beauveria bassiana Bionectria sp. (anamorph: Clonostachys sp.) Blastobotrys sp. Botrytis cinerea Cephalotheca sulfurea Cephalotrichum purpureofuscum/ Doratomyces sp. Chaetomidium leptoderma Hypocreales Saccharomycetales Helotiales Cephalothecales Microascales Sordariales 4 1 6 1 2 3 1 NR_164219.1; JN573175.1 OP038661.1/KU954345.1 OM262341.1 OM349592.1; MT150132.1; MH992148.1; AB693927.1; MK513827.1; MF661902.1 MK246187.1 MH729023.1; KU951245.1 OK331343.1 MT645930.1 MK332591.1 1 Aspergillus tamarii Hypocreales Morphology to flower/fruit isolates MN533721.1; MT447480.1; MN533721.1 4 Aspergillus ochraceus Dothidiales MN956655.1 MT529448.1; MT529125.1; MH793851.1 1 7 KU702707.1 KX378907.1; KX148691.1 OW982982.1 MN242723.1; KJ207403.1 Aspergillus flavipes Eurotiales 1 4 1 2 Aspergillus fumigatus Arthrinium spp. Arthrobotrys amerospora Xylariales Apiospora kogelbergensis Xylariales Orbiliales Amorphotheca resinae Heliotiales MK801346.1 1 8 Alternaria infectoria Alternaria spp. OK274326.1; OK274326.1; KX139150.1; MK640587.1; MW534563.1; HQ649962.1 OP696965.1; OL711657.1 2 Alternaria alternata KP131521.1 1 Acremonium hyalinulum Pleosporales MH858153.1 1 Acremonium roseolum GenBank accession # Hypocreales # of isolates Name Order 97.61; 97.68; 97.86 99.29/99.47 99.61 100; 100; 99.39; 100; 100; 88.25 99.81 99.61; 99.67 98.46 93.0 Root bulb (3); Root hair (1) Leaf Leaf Leaf Root bulb Root bulb (1); Root hair (1) Leaf Leaf Leaf Leaf (3); Root hair (1) — 97.99 Leaf (6) Leaf Root hair Leaf (4) Leaf Leaf (2) Leaf (6); Root bulb (2) Leaf Leaf (1); Root bulb (1) Leaf Leaf Source 98.92; 99.28 95.01 99.62 99.83 100; 99.24 99.25 98.34; 95.96 100; 99.46; 84.0; 99.5; 98.67; 99.38 95.15 99.61; 99.62 98.68 98.66 % identity 252763 252788 252787 252754 252759 252764 252753 252756 (Continues) DAOMC ID # TA B L E 5 Identity of fungal endophytes recovered from leaves, stems, and roots of mature monk fruit plants grown in the KPU research greenhouse based on rDNA ITS sequence analyses and morphology. MA et al. | 9 of 16 MK905459.1 1 9 Cladosporium tenuissimum Cladosporium spp. MH729023.1/KU951245.1 KM921661.1 KR906700.1; KC304797.1; FJ824032.1; MT529814.1 MN833356.1 10 1 Fusarium oxysporum Fusarium tricinctum MH086786.1 1 Hypocreales 1 OP315769.1; OP315769.1; OP315769.1; MH861752.1 MN612779.1 1 Fomitopsis mounceae Polyporales 7 1 Fusarium haematococcum/F. solani Epicoccum nigrum Pleosporales Fusarium lichenicola Didymella anserina Pleosporales MK335735.1 LC605635.1 1 1 Curvularia coatesiae Diaporthe eres NR_170004.1; OK117928.1 1 MN841919.1; MF351861.1; MN841919.1; MN841919.1 12 Curvularia canadensis /C. inaequalis MZ407758.1 2 Coprinopsis cinerea MF156262.1; MF156262.1; LR961895.1; LR961895.1; MF156262.1; LR961895.1 6 Coprinellus micaceus Coprinopsis alnivora MK656240.1 5 Coprinellus flocculosus Diaporthales Pleosporales Agaricales Agaricales OP006753.1 1 ON208763.1; KT826671.1; MH137774.1 ON712476.1 1 Cladosporium ramotenellum MZ724883.1; MZ724884.1 MH861746.1 2 1 Chaetomium novozelandicum Chaetomium spinosum Cladosporium herbarum KP067223.1; MF476072.1 3 Chaetomium globosum Cladosporiales KP278194.1; MW533023.1 2 Chaetomium aureum (teliomorph: Arcopilus aureus) GenBank accession # Sordariales # of isolates Name Order TA B L E 5 (Continued) 99.81 95.63; 99.8; 99.8; 98.29 99.42 99.61/99.67 98.03 100; 100; 99.59; 99.79 99.14 99.63 96.53 99.62; 99.62 96.91; 99.68; 99.69; 99.85 98.02 100; 99.84; 99.84; 99.23; 99.84; 98.06 96.88; 96.88; 97.31 93.16; 98.99; 98.39 99.39 99.8 99.4 99.05 98.82; 99.81 100; 98.21 100; 100 % identity Root bulb Root bulb (6); Root hair (4) Root bulb Root hair Leaf Leaf (6); Root bulb (1) Leaf Root bulb Leaf Leaf Leaf Leaf Leaf Leaf Leaf Leaf Leaf Leaf Leaf Leaf Leaf (2); Stem (1) Root bulb Source 252752 252778 252740 252770 252755 252765 252766; 252775 252779 DAOMC ID # 10 of 16 | MA et al. MH865756.1 MK534497.1/KM613146.1; MK534497.1/MT303132.1 MH655003.1 KX610174.1/MT582790.1 1 2 1 1 22 Lophiostoma corticola / Angustimassarina coryli Mortierella hyalina Nemania sp. Nigrospora oryzae Panaeolus subbalteatus Paraconiothyrium fuckelii Paraphaeosphaeria sporulosa Penicillium canescens Penicillium cataractarum /P. simplicissimum Penicillium cinnamopurpureum Penicillium citrinum/P. steckii Penicillium spp. Mortierellales Xylariales Xylariales Agaricales Pleosporales Pleosporales Eurotiales Pleosporales Unidentified ON927102.1; MW850542.1 MT447499.1 2 9 Plectosphaerella cucumerinum Plectosphaerella oligotrophica Glomerellales 1 1 MG916998.1 NR_165996.1; MH857776.1 ON520767.1 Phialemonium inflatum 1 Phaeosphaeria sp. Cephalothecales MK907734.1 Pleosporales 1 Periconia byssoides OP035353.1; OP647345.1; KY401082.1; MH512953.1; MH512953.1; MH512953.1; ON182131.1; ON182131.1; ON182131.1; ON182131.1 KX302013.1; MH859903.1 MK052700.1 MH855553.1 KC131293.1 MT153669.1 MT003063.1 MK907710.1/MF167431.1 Pleosporales 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 MH857054.1 KX343155.1; MN541090.1 Pleosporales 1 Linnemannia zychae 3 Lasiosphaeriaceae Mortierellales AY787708.2; MT214998.1 10 Hypoxylon rubiginosum Sordariales HM192912.1 8 Hypoxylon macrocarpum GenBank accession # Xylariales # of isolates Name Order TA B L E 5 (Continued) 99.22 99.6; 99.8 99.4; 99.8 99.61; 96.58 99.6 Leaf Root bulb (3); Root hair (5); Stem (1) Root bulb Stem Leaf Leaf Leaf (11); Root bulb (11) 99.63 Root bulb 99.62; 99.06; 99.44; 99.26; 99.45; 99.26; 100; 100; 99.81; 99.81 Leaf Root bulb (1); Root hair (1) Leaf Root bulb (4); Root hair (1) Leaf Leaf Leaf Leaf Root bulb Leaf Root bulb Root hair Leaf Leaf Source 95.16/94.72 99.65 99.44/100; 99.63/99.45 99.62 99.82; 99.82 99.29 98.73 99.41 99.22 99.83 100/100 99.83 99.8; 99.59 99.80; 99.80; 99.80; 99.41; 99.80; 100; 91.2; 92.88 96.38; 99.46; 98.6; 98.43; 99.3; 98.78; 97.69; 99.47 % identity 252768 (Continues) 252782; 252784 252777; 252790 252783 252785 252795 252746 252767 252761; 252771 252792 252791 252757 252749 252794 252774 252769; 252773 DAOMC ID # MA et al. | 11 of 16 Varicosporium delicatum Helotiales 1 1 JQ412864.1 GQ888733.1 Morphology only 93.75 91.12 — 96.0 99.26 99.47 91.9 99.63; 99.28; 99.27 99.83 99.83 99.44/99.25; 99.81/99.62; 99.62/99.43; 100/99.81 99.64 % identity Leaf Leaf Root bulb (1); Root hair (3) Root bulb Leaf Root bulb Root bulb Root bulb Leaf Leaf Root bulb (9); Root hair (2) Leaf Source 252793 252760 252745 252750 252786 252780; 252781 DAOMC ID # Note: The closest match in BLASTn to sequences deposited in GenBank and percent identity are shown, and the specimen ID # of isolates deposited in the Canadian Collection of Fungal Cultures (DAOMC). Ustanciosporium appendiculatum 4 Trichoderma spp. Ustilaginales JX273473.1 1 1 Sordaria fimicola Trichoderma ghanense Sordariales Hypocreales MT520628.1 KC403970.1 MW260103.1 1 1 Simplicillium obclavatum AB604004.1; MK579181.1; MK579181.1 OW987158.1 3 1 Simplicillium subtropicum Simplicillium aogashimaense Hypocreales ON500589.1 1 Schizophyllum commune Scopulariopsis brevicaulis Agaricales Microascales KJ862077.1 KX384658.1/MF077236.1; KX384658.1/MF077236.1; KF293986.1/MF077237.1; KF293986.1/ON500613.1 1 11 Purpureocillium lilacinum Sarocladium kiliense/S. strictum Hypocreales GenBank accession # Hypocreales # of isolates Name Order TA B L E 5 (Continued) 12 of 16 | MA et al. | 13 of 16 MA et al. F I G U R E 3 Number of fungal isolates in different taxonomic orders isolated from roots, stems, leaves, flowers, fruits, and seeds of monk fruit. and S. obclavatum, isolated here from monk fruit root bulbs, are mycoparasites that have shown efficacy against, respectively, powdery mildew and stripe rust of wheat (Wang et al., 2020; Zhu et al., 2022). Paecilomyces variotii is an effective biocontrol agent of gummy stem blight and powdery mildew of cucumber, and has been shown to inhibit other plant pathogens including nematodes (Moreno-­G avíra et al., 2021). Purpureocillium lilacinum [syn. Paecilomyces lilacinus (Thom) Samson] is a parasite of nematode eggs (Kiewnick & Sikora, 2004), an entomopathogen, and has been shown to promote the growth of tomato under heavy metal stress (Musa et al., 2023). Strains of P. lilacinum have been registered in the USA and Europe for control of parasitic nematodes in crops. Arthrobotrys amerispora, isolated from a root hair of the monk fruit, may be playing a role in root proF I G U R E 4 Measure of dissimilarity in the endophytic fungi composition among the root, stem, leaf, flower, fruit, and seed of monk fruit using non-­metric multidimensional scaling. tection; Arthrobotrys spp. are well-­ k nown nematode-­ t rapping fungi as well as mycoparasites (Gams et al., 2004). Eight endophytic strains of the entomopathogen Beauveria bassiana were recovered from the monk fruit tissues, in addition to a Bionectria sp. (anamorph: Clonostachys; syn. Gliocladium) and several (Kulišová et al., 2021). Endophytic strains of E. nigrum have Trichoderma spp., which are well-­ k nown protectors of plants been shown to reduce the incidence and severity of a range from pathogen and insect attack, as well as plant growth pro- of plant diseases (Taguiam et al., 2021). In British Columbia, moters (Sharma & Gothalwal, 2017). an isolate of E. nigrum from mummy berry-­infected blueberries For some plant pathogenic fungi, existence as an endophyte suppressed spring apothecia production of Monilinia vaccinii-­ may be a latent stage in pathogenesis. Disease develops as the corymbosi when applied to soil after infected berries dropped host plant reaches a certain life stage or begins to senesce, or (Kitura et al., 2023). Hypoxylon rubiginosum has shown promise as the plant experiences environmental stress or other damage. as a biocontrol for dieback of European ash (Fraxinus excelsior Botrytis cinerea, for example, is a common pathogen causing gray L.), associated with its production of the anti-­f ungal metabolite, mold disease of many crops but is often found as an endophyte phomopsidin (Halecker et al., 2020). Simplicillium aogashimaense in healthy plant tissues. The two Colletotrichum spp. isolated 14 of 16 | MA et al. from the internal tissues of monk fruit seeds in this study are DATA AVA I L A B I L I T Y S TAT E M E N T known plant pathogens and may be a quiescent stage in the de- The data that support the findings of this study are openly available velopment of anthracnose disease. Plectosphaerella cucumerinum in figshare: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24530542. (syn. Plectosporium tabacinum) causes wilt and root rot of several crops including cucurbits, tomato, potato, and basil (Raimondo & ORCID Carlucci, 2018) and may be a quiescent pathogen in the monk fruit Li Ma https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4739-1670 plants, while Pl. oligotrophica is a low-­c arbon feeding, soil saprophyte (Liu et al., 2013) that may be neutral, or play a beneficial role REFERENCES in the presence of biotic or abiotic stresses. As an example of the Alam, M. W., Malik, A., Rehman, A., Sarwar, M., & Mehboob, S. (2021). First report of potato wilt caused by Plectosphaerella cucumerina in Pakistan. Journal of Plant Pathology, 103, 687. Aly, A. H., Debbab, A., Kjer, J., & Proksch, P. (2010). Fungal endophytes from higher plants: A prolific source of phytochemicals and other bioactive natural products. Fungal Diversity, 41, 1–16. Aly, A. H., Debbab, A., & Proksch, P. (2011). Fungal endophytes: Unique plant inhabitants with great promises. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 90, 1829–1845. Atkins, S. D., Clark, I. M., Sosnowska, D., Hirsch, P. R., & Kerry, B. R. (2003). Detection and quantification of Plectosphaerella cucumerina, a potential biological control agent of potato cyst nematodes, by using conventional PCR, real-­time PCR, selective media, and baiting. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69, 4788–4793. Becker, K., & Stadler, M. (2021). Recent progress in biodiversity research on the Xylariales and their secondary metabolism. The Journal of Antibiotics, 74, 1–23. Busby, P. E., Ridout, M., & Newcombe, G. (2016). Fungal endophytes: Modifiers of plant disease. Plant Molecular Biology, 90, 645–655. Carrieri, R., Borriello, G., Piccirillo, G., Lahoz, E., Sorrentino, R., Cermola, M., Bolletti-­Censi, S., Grauso, L., Mangoni, A., & Vinale, F. (2020). Antibiotic activity of a Paraphaeosphaeria sporulosa-­produced diketopiperazine against Salmonella enterica. Journal of Fungi (Basel)., 6(2), 83. Cenis, J. L. (1992). Rapid extraction of fungal DNA for PCR amplification. Nucleic Acids Research, 20, 2380. Chen, B., Yu, F., & Zhi, J. (2020). Mogroside V-­producing endophytic fungi isolated from Siraitia grosvenorii. Planta Medica, 86, 983–987. Da Sila, J., Rodrigues, F. M., Volcão, L. M., Hoscha, L. C., & Pereira, S. V. (2018). Growth of the fungus Chaetomium aureum in the presence of lead: Implications in bioremediation. Environmental Earth Sciences, 77, 275. de Lamo, F. J., & Takken, F. L. W. (2020). Biocontrol by fusarium oxysporum using endophyte-­ mediated resistance. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 37. Di, R., Huang, M.-­T., & Ho, C.-­T. (2011). Anti-­inflammatory activities of mogrosides from Momordica grosvenori in murine macrophages and a murine ear edema model. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 13, 7474–7481. Dwibedi, V., Rath, S. K., Jain, S., Martínez-­ Argueta, N., Prakash, R., Saxena, S., & Rios-­Solis, L. (2023). Key insights into secondary metabolites from various Chaetomium species. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 107, 1077–1093. Dwibedi, V., & Saxena, S. (2018). Arcopilus aureus, a resveratrol-­ producing endophyte from Vitis vinifera. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 186, 476–495. Fonseca, C. S., da Silva, N. R., Ballesteros, L. F., Basto, B., Abrunhosa, L., Teixeira, J. A., & Silvério, S. C. (2022). Penicillium brevicompactum as a novel source of natural pigments with potential for food applications. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 132, 188–199. Gams, W., Diederich, P., & Põldmaa, K. (2004). Fungicolous fungi. In G. M. Mueller, G. F. Bills, & M. S. Foster (Eds.), Biodiversity of fungi: Inventory and monitoring methods (pp. 343–392). Elsevier Academic Press. multiple potential roles of a single endophytic species, Pl. cucumerinum is also nematophagous and has been tested for biocontrol of potato cyst nematode (Atkins et al., 2003), although, more recently, it has also been shown to cause potato wilt disease in China (Gao et al., 2016) and Pakistan (Alam et al., 2021). Paraconiothyrium fuckelii (syn. Leptosphaeria coniothyrium, basionym: Coniothyrium fuckelii) is a wound pathogen causing cane blight of raspberry, rose, and other woody hosts worldwide (Guarnaccia et al., 2022). It is also known as a saprobe, but its potential role as an endophyte in these hosts has not been explored. Among some species of plant pathogens, endophytic and pathogenic strains have quite different relationships and effects on their hosts. Endophytic strains of Fusarium oxysporum have been shown to reduce root rot and wilt diseases caused by pathogenic strains in tomato and other crops (de Lamo & Takken, 2020). The endophytic strains of F. oxysporum have fewer effectors and exhibit different patterns of tissue colonization and triggering of host defenses than pathogenic strains. Further understanding of the role of endophytes in plant protection and pathogenesis may reveal additional new, sustainable methods of plant disease control. In summary, monk fruit plants can be easily grown in the greenhouse and are a prolific source of endophytic fungi and secondary metabolites for potential research and development. This work has deepened our understanding of the intricate interactions between plants and fungi that sustain ecosystems and underpin plant health and resilience. These findings can inform strategies for developing climate-­resilient crops and restoring ecosystems in the face of climate challenges and developing more sustainable and eco-­ f riendly strategies for plant health management. Our analysis did not include bacterial or viral endophytes, or fungi that did not grow on PDA. Further investigation of monk fruit as a potential source of these endophytes may reveal even more useful strains and advance our understanding of how endophytes interact with their hosts. AC K N OW L E D G M E N T S We thank NutraEx Food Inc. for financial support. We also thank Erwin Yamzon for his advice on statistical analyses and Yasaman Morshedikermani for preparing the isolates for DAOMC. C O N FL I C T O F I N T E R E S T S TAT E M E N T The authors declare no conflict of interest. MA et al. Gao, J., Zhang, Y. Y., Zhao, X. J., Wang, K., & Zhao, J. (2016). First report of potato wilt caused by Plectosphaerella cucumerina in Inner Mongolia, China. Plant Disease, 100, 2523. Germaine, K., Keogh, E., Garcia-­C abellos, G., Borremans, B., Lelie, D., Barac, T., Oeyen, L., Vangronsveld, J., Moore, F. P., Moore, E. R., Campbell, C. D., Ryan, D., Dowling, D. N. (2004). Colonisation of poplar trees by gfp expressing bacterial endophytes. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 48, 109–118. Guarnaccia, V., Martino, I., Brondino, L., & Gullino, M. L. (2022). Paraconiothyrium fuckelii, Diaporthe eres and Neocosmospora parceramosa causing cane blight of red raspberry in northern Italy. Journal of Plant Pathology, 104, 683–698. Halecker, S., Wennrich, J. P., Rodrigo, S., Andrée, N., Rabsch, L., Baschien, C., Steinert, M., Stadler, M., Surup, F., & Schulz, B. (2020). Fungal endophytes for biocontrol of ash dieback: The antagonistic potential of Hypoxylon rubiginosum. Fungal Ecology, 45, 100918. Horn, B. W., & Peterson, S. W. (2008). Host specificity of Eupenicillium ochrosalmoneum, E. cinnamopurpureum and two Penicillium species associated with the conidial heads of Aspergillus. Mycologia, 100, 12–19. Keekan, K. K., Hallur, S., Modi, P. K., & Shastry, R. P. (2020). Antioxidant activity and role of culture condition in the optimization of red pigment production by Talaromyces purpureogenus KKP through response surface methodology. Current Microbiology, 77, 1780–1789. Kiewnick, S., & Sikora, R. A. (2004). Optimizing the efficacy of Paecilomyces lilacinus (strain 251) for the control of root-­knot nematodes. Communications in Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences, 69, 373–380. Kitura, E., Punja, A., & Henderson, D. (2023). Evaluation of Epicoccum nigrum for suppression of Monilinia vaccinii-­corymbosi in highbush blueberry production. Paper presented at: CPS 2023. Proceedings of the Canadian Phytopathological society annual meeting; June 17–21; Ottawa, Canada. Kulišová, M., Vrublevskaya, M., Lovecká, P., Vrchotová, B., Stránská, M., Kolaˇrík, M., & Kolouchová, I. (2021). Fungal endophytes of Vitis vinifera—Plant growth promotion factors. Agriculture, 11, 1250. Liu, T.-­T., Hu, D.-­M., Liu, F., & Cai, L. (2013). Polyphasic characterization of Plectosphaerella oligotrophica, a new oligotrophic species from China. Mycoscience, 54, 387–393. Moreno-­Gavíra, A., Diánez, F., Sánchez-­Montesinos, B., & Santos, M. (2021). Biocontrol effects of Paecilomyces variotii against fungal plant diseases. Journal of Fungi, 7, 415. Musa, M., Jan, F. G., Hamayun, M., Jan, G., Khan, S. A., Rehman, G., Ali, S., & Lee, I.-­J. (2023). An endophytic fungal isolate Paecilomyces lilacinus produces bioactive secondary metabolites and promotes growth of Solanum lycopersicum under heavy metal stress. Agronomy, 13, 883. Nisa, H., Kamili, A. N., Nawchoo, I. A., Shafi, S., Shameem, N., & Bandh, S. A. (2015). Fungal endophytes as prolific source of phytochemicals and other bioactive natural products: A review. Microbial Pathogenesis, 82, 50–59. Peters, L. P., Prado, L. S., Silva, F. I., Souza, F. S., & Carvalho, C. M. (2020). Selection of endophytes as antagonists of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides in açaí palm. Biological Control, 150, 104350. Petrini, O. (1986). Taxonomy of endophytic fungi of aerial plant tissues. In N. J. Fokkema & J. van den Huevel (Eds.), Microbiology of the phyllosphere (pp. 175–187). Cambridge University Press. Rafin, C., & Veignie, E. (2018). Hormoconis resinae, the kerosene fungus. In T. McGenity (Ed.), Taxonomy, genomics and ecophysiology of hydrocarbon-­degrading microbes. Handbook of hydrocarbon and lipid microbiology. Springer. | 15 of 16 Raimondo, M. L., & Carlucci, A. (2018). Characterization and pathogenicity assessment of Plectosphaerella species associated with stunting disease on tomato and pepper crops in Italy. Plant Pathology, 67, 626–641. Rodriguez, R. J., & Redman, R. (2008). More than 400 million years of evolution and some plants still can't make it on their own: Plant stress tolerance via fungal symbiosis. Journal of Experimental Botany, 59, 1109–1114. Rodriguez, R. J., White, J. F., Jr., Arnold, A. E., & Redman, R. S. (2009). Fungal endophytes: Diversity and functional roles. The New Phytologist, 182, 314–330. Saikkonen, K., Faeth, S. H., Helander, M., & Sullivan, T. J. (1998). Fungal endophytes: A continuum of interactions with host plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 29, 319–343. Saikkonen, K., Ion, D., & Gyllenberg, M. (2002). The persistence of vertically transmitted fungi in grass metapopulations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 269, 1397–1403. Sharma, P. K., & Gothalwal, R. (2017). Trichoderma: A potent fungus as biological control agent. In J. Singh & G. Seneviratne (Eds.), Agro-­ environmental sustainability (pp. 113–125). Springer. Shearin, Z. R., Filipek, M., Desai, R., Bickford, W. A., Kowalski, K. P., & Clay, K. (2018). Fungal endophytes from seeds of invasive, non-­ native Phragmites australis and their potential role in germination and seedling growth. Plant and Soil, 422, 183–194. Shivani, B. K. T., Mallikarjun, C. P., Mahajan, M., Kapoor, P., Malhotra, J., Dhiman, R., Kumar, D., Pal, P. K., & Kumar, S. (2021). Introduction, adaptation and characterization of monk fruit (Siraitia grosvenorii): A non-­c aloric new natural sweetener. Scientific Reports, 11, 6205. Stierle, A., Strobel, G., & Stierle, D. (1993). Taxol and taxane production by Taxomyces andreanae, an endophytic fungus of Pacific yew. Science, 260, 214–216. Stone, J. K., Bacon, C. W., & White, J. F., Jr. (2000). An overview of endophytic microbes: Endophytism defined. In C. W. Bacon & J. F. White, Jr. (Eds.), Microbial endophytes (1st ed.). CRC Press. Stone, J. K., Polishook, J. D., & White, J. F., Jr. (2004). Endophytic fungi. In G. Mueller, G. F. Bills, & M. S. Foster (Eds.), Biodiversity of fungi: Inventory and monitoring methods (pp. 241–270). Elsevier Academic Press. Sun, B. S., Chen, Y. P., Wang, Y. B., Tang, S. W., Pan, F. U., Li, Z., & Sung, C. K. (2012). Anti-­obesity effects of mogrosides extracted from the fruits of Siraitia grosvenorii (Cucurbitaceae). African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 6, 1492–1501. Taguiam, J. D., Evallo, E., & Balendres, M. A. (2021). Epicoccum species: Ubiquitous plant pathogens and effective biological control agents. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 159, 713–725. Takasaki, M., Konoshima, T., Murata, Y., Sugiura, M., Nishino, H., Tokuda, H., Matsumoto, K., Kasai, R., & Yamasaki, K. (2003). Anticarcinogenic activity of natural sweeteners, cucurbitane glycosides, from Momordica grosvenori. Cancer Letters, 198, 37–42. Van Rossum, G., & Drake, F. L., Jr. (1995). Python tutorial. Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica. Wang, N., Fan, X., Zhang, S., Liu, B., He, M., Chen, X., Tang, C., Kang, Z., & Wang, X. (2020). Identification of a hyperparasitic Simplicillium obclavatum strain affecting the infection dynamics of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici on Wheat. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11, 1277. White, T. J., Bruns, T. D., Lee, S. B., & Taylor, J. W. (1990). Analysis of phylogenetic relationships by amplification and direct sequencing of ribosomal DNA genes. In M. A. Innis, D. H. Gelfand, J. J. Sninsky, & T. J. White (Eds.), PCR protocols: A guide to methods and applications (pp. 315–322). Academic Press. Xia, Y., Rivero-­Huguet, M. E., Hughes, B. H., & Marshall, W. D. (2008). Isolation of the sweet components from Siraitia grosvenorii. Food Chemistry, 107, 1022–1028. 16 of 16 | Zeng, Q., Ma, X., Peng, P., Xu, W., Feng, S. X., Wei, R. C., Huang, X., Tang, Q., Wang, X., & Pan, L. M. (2011). Agrogeological investigation on the original producing area of Siraitia grosvenorii. In 2011 International Conference on Multimedia Technology, Hangzhou, China (pp. 5264–5267). IEEE. Zhang, H. W., Song, Y. C., & Tan, R. X. (2006). Biology and chemistry of endophytes. Natural Product Reports, 23, 753–771. Zhu, M., Duan, X., Cai, P., Li, Y.-­F., & Qiu, Z. (2022). Deciphering the genome of Simplicillium aogashimaense to understand its mechanisms against the wheat powdery mildew fungus Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 4, 16. MA et al. How to cite this article: Ma, L., Elmhirst, J. F., Darvish, R., Wegener, L. A., & Henderson, D. (2024). Abundance and diversity of fungal endophytes isolated from monk fruit (Siraitia grosvenorii) grown in a Canadian research greenhouse. Plant-­Environment Interactions, 5, e10142. https://doi.org/10.1002/pei3.10142