Hindsight bias and law
Digital Document
Content type |
Content type
|
---|---|
Collection(s) |
Collection(s)
|
Resource Type |
Resource Type
|
Genre |
Genre
|
Origin Information |
|
---|
Persons |
Author (aut): Giroux, Megan E.
Author (aut): Coburn, Patricia I.
Author (aut): Harley, Erin M.
Author (aut): Connolly, Deborah A.
Author (aut): Bernstein, Daniel M.
|
---|
Abstract |
Abstract
Hindsight bias is the tendency to overestimate the foreseeability of an outcome once it is known. This bias has implications for decisions made within the legal system, ranging from judgments made during investigations to those in court proceedings. Legal decision makers should only consider what was known at the time an investigation was conducted or an offense was committed; however, they often review cases with full knowledge of a negative outcome, which can affect their judgments about what was knowable in the past. We conducted a systematic review of the literature on hindsight bias and law. We present five areas of law that hindsight bias affects (medical malpractice, forensic investigation, negligence, patent, criminal), two types of evidence that may lead to hindsight bias (visual and auditory evidence), and hindsight bias in experts and judges. Finally, we discuss strategies for reducing hindsight bias in legal decisions and recommend future research. |
---|
Publication Title |
Publication Title
|
---|---|
Publication Number |
Publication Number
Volume 224
|
Publication Genre |
Publication Genre
|
Related Item |
Related Item
|
---|
DOI |
DOI
10.1027/2151-2604/a000253
|
---|---|
Handle |
Handle
Handle placeholder
|
Rights Statement |
Rights Statement
|
---|